Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Forum - Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Vce Free

DOWNLOAD the newest Pass4SureQuiz ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wOQ22En8ku3HUYZBpyGTnrz077e08Cvt

Pass4SureQuiz PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps save your study and preparation time. Our experts have added hundreds of PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) questions similar to the real exam. You can prepare for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam dumps during your job. You don't need to visit the market or any store because Pass4SureQuiz PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam questions are easily accessible from the website.

The ISO/IEC 27001 standard outlines the requirements for an information security management system (ISMS). The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification exam evaluates the knowledge and skills of professionals in implementing and auditing an ISMS based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is suitable for professionals working in information security, risk management, compliance, or auditing, as well as those who wish to advance their career in these fields. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is recognized globally and can help professionals demonstrate their proficiency in information security management and auditing.

>> Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Forum <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor study materials - PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps VCE

Continuous improvement is a good thing. If you keep making progress and transcending yourself, you will harvest happiness and growth. The goal of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor latest exam guide is prompting you to challenge your limitations. People always complain that they do nothing perfectly. As long as you submit your email address and apply for our free trials, we will soon send the free demo of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor training practice to your mailbox. If you are uncertain which one suit you best, you can ask for different kinds free trials of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor latest exam guide in the meantime. After deliberate consideration, you can pick one kind of study materials from our websites and prepare the exam.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q315-Q320):

NEW QUESTION # 315
Which three of the following work documents are not required for audit planning by an auditor conducting a certification audit?

A. A list of external providers
B. A checklist
C. A sample plan
D. An organisation's financial statement
E. A career history of the IT manager
F. An audit plan

Answer: A,D,E

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, an auditor conducting a certification audit should prepare for an audit by reviewing relevant information about the auditee's context and processes1. This may include reviewing documented information related to the audited management system (such as policies, procedures, manuals), previous audit reports and records (such as findings, nonconformities, corrective actions), relevant legal and regulatory requirements (such as laws, standards), relevant risks and opportunities (such as internal and external issues), relevant performance indicators (such as objectives, targets), etc1. Therefore, an auditor may need work documents such as an audit plan (which defines what will be done during an audit), a sample plan (which defines how many samples will be taken from a population), and a checklist (which helps to ensure that all relevant aspects are covered during an audit)1. However, an auditor does not need work documents such as an organisation's financial statement (which is not directly related to information security management), a career history of the IT manager (which is not relevant to assessing conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022), or a list of external providers (which is not necessary for planning an audit)1. References: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 316
Scenario 7: Lawsy is a leading law firm with offices in New Jersey and New York City. It has over 50 attorneys offering sophisticated legal services to clients in business and commercial law, intellectual property, banking, and financial services. They believe they have a comfortable position in the market thanks to their commitment to implement information security best practices and remain up to date with technological developments.
Lawsy has implemented, evaluated, and conducted internal audits for an ISMS rigorously for two years now. Now, they have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification to ISMA, a well-known and trusted certification body.
During stage 1 audit, the audit team reviewed all the ISMS documents created during the implementation. They also reviewed and evaluated the records from management reviews and internal audits.
Lawsy submitted records of evidence that corrective actions on nonconformities were performed when necessary, so the audit team interviewed the internal auditor. The interview validated the adequacy and frequency of the internal audits by providing detailed insight into the internal audit plan and procedures.
The audit team continued with the verification of strategic documents, including the information security policy and risk evaluation criteri a. During the information security policy review, the team noticed inconsistencies between the documented information describing governance framework (i.e., the information security policy) and the procedures.
Although the employees were allowed to take the laptops outside the workplace, Lawsy did not have procedures in place regarding the use of laptops in such cases. The policy only provided general information about the use of laptops. The company relied on employees' common knowledge to protect the confidentiality and integrity of information stored in the laptops. This issue was documented in the stage 1 audit report.
Upon completing stage 1 audit, the audit team leader prepared the audit plan, which addressed the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and procedures.
During stage 2 audit, the audit team interviewed the information security manager, who drafted the information security policy. He justified the Issue identified in stage 1 by stating that Lawsy conducts mandatory information security training and awareness sessions every three months.
Following the interview, the audit team examined 15 employee training records (out of 50) and concluded that Lawsy meets requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 related to training and awareness. To support this conclusion, they photocopied the examined employee training records.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Based on scenario 7, what should Lawsy do prior to the initiation of stage 2 audit?

A. Define which audit test plans can be combined to verify compliance
B. Perform a quality review of audit findings from stage 1 audit
C. Review and confirm the audit plan with the certification body

Answer: C

Explanation:
Prior to the initiation of stage 2 audit, Lawsy should review and confirm the audit plan with the certification body. This ensures that both parties agree on the objectives, scope, and procedures for the stage 2 audit, thus aligning expectations and facilitating a smoother audit process.

NEW QUESTION # 317
Select the words that best complete the sentence:
To complete the sentence with the word(s) click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the application text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation
competence of the audit team and decision made by the certification body According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, an accredited certification means that the certification body has been evaluated by an accreditation body against recognized standards to demonstrate its competence, impartiality and performance capability1. Therefore, an accredited certification assures the competence of the audit team that conducts the audit in accordance with ISO 19011 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and the decision made by the certification body that grants or maintains the certification based on the audit evidence and findings2. References: ISO/IEC
17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) | CQI | IRCA

NEW QUESTION # 318
You are an ISMS audit team leader tasked with conducting a follow-up audit at a client's data centre.
Following two days on-site you conclude that of the original 12 minor and 1 major nonconformities that prompted the follow-up audit, only 1 minor nonconformity still remains outstanding.
Select four options for the actions you could take.

A. Advise the auditee that you will arrange an online audit to deal with the outstanding nonconformity
B. Book another follow-up audit on-site to review the one outstanding minor nonconformity once it has been cleared
C. Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit
D. Recommend suspension of the organisation's certification as they have failed to implement the agreed corrections and corrective actions within the agreed timescale
E. Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified
F. Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity
G. Note the progress made but hold the audit open until all corrective action has been cleared
H. Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised

Answer: C,E,F,H

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 requires the audit team leader to conduct a follow-up audit to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee in response to the nonconformities identified during a previous audit1. The follow-up audit should be conducted in accordance with the same principles and processes as the initial audit, and should result in a conclusion on the status of the nonconformities and any remaining issues1.
Therefore, when conducting a follow-up audit, an ISMS auditor should consider the following actions:
* Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has cleared most of the nonconformities, including the major one, and only one minor nonconformity remains outstanding. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. Therefore, this finding does not prevent or preclude the continuation of certification, as long as it is addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit, which is a regular audit conducted by the certification body to confirm the ongoing conformity and effectiveness of an ISMS3.
* Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has demonstrated commitment and capability to implement corrective actions for the nonconformities identified during the previous audit. The auditor should agree with the auditee/audit client on a realistic, achievable, and effective corrective action plan for the remaining nonconformity, including a clear deadline and verification method. The auditor should also document this agreement in the follow-up audit report1.
* Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a systematic and consistent approach to conducting and reporting the follow-up audit. The auditor should advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding
* nonconformity, such as recommending its closure at the next surveillance audit or agreeing on a corrective action plan with the auditee/audit client. The auditor should also provide sufficient information and evidence to support their decision1.
* Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the organisation has achieved satisfactory results in the follow-up audit. The auditor should close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised by implementing effective corrective actions for most of them and agreeing on a plan for the remaining one. The auditor should also communicate the follow-up audit conclusion to the auditee/audit client and other relevant parties1.

NEW QUESTION # 319
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader guiding an auditor in training. She asks you about the grading of nonconformities in audit reports. You decide to test her knowledge by asking her which four of the following statements are true.

A. Nonconformities must be graded only using the terms 'major' or 'minor'
B. The action taken to address major nonconformities is typically more substantial than the action taken to address minor nonconformities
C. Major nonconformities may be subject to on-site follow up
D. Very minor nonconformities should be re-graded as opportunities for improvement
E. Nonconformities may be graded to indicate their significance
F. The auditee is always responsible for determining the criteria for grading nonconformities
G. Several minor nonconformities can be grouped into a major nonconformity
H. The grading of nonconformities must be explained to the auditee at the opening meeting

Answer: B,C,E,G

Explanation:
Explanation
The four statements that are true are:
*Major nonconformities may be subject to on-site follow up
*The action taken to address major nonconformities is typically more substantial than the action taken to address minor nonconformities
*Several minor nonconformities can be grouped into a major nonconformity
*Nonconformities may be graded to indicate their significance
According to ISO 19011:2018, a nonconformity is the non-fulfilment of a requirement1. Nonconformities may be graded to indicate their significance, based on the criteria established by the audit programme or the audit client2. The grading of nonconformities may use different terms or levels, such as major, minor, critical, etc., depending on the nature and context of the audit3. However, some common definitions of major and minor nonconformities are:
*A major nonconformity is a nonconformity that affects the ability of the management system to achieve its intended results, or that represents a significant breakdown of the management system4. Major nonconformities may require immediate corrective action and on-site follow up by the auditor to verify their closure5.
*A minor nonconformity is a nonconformity that does not affect the ability of the management system to achieve its intended results, or that represents an isolated lapse of the management system4. Minor nonconformities may require corrective action within a specified time frame and off-site verification by the auditor to confirm their closure5.
The action taken to address nonconformities depends on the severity and impact of the nonconformity, and the risk of recurrence or escalation. Typically, the action taken to address major nonconformities is more substantial than the action taken to address minor nonconformities, as it may involve identifying and eliminating the root cause of the problem, implementing preventive measures, and monitoring the effectiveness of the solution.
Several minor nonconformities can be grouped into a major nonconformity if they are related to the same requirement, process, or area, and if they indicate a systemic failure or a significant risk to the management system. The auditor should use professional judgment and evidence-based approach to decide whether to group or report nonconformities individually.
The other statements are false, based on the guidance of ISO 19011:2018. For example:
*Option B is false, because nonconformities can be graded using different terms or levels, depending on the criteria established by the audit programme or the audit client2. The terms 'major' and 'minor' are not mandatory or universal, but rather examples of possible grading levels3.
*Option D is false, because very minor nonconformities should not be re-graded as opportunities for improvement, but rather reported as nonconformities, as they still represent a non-fulfilment of a requirement1. An opportunity for improvement is a suggestion for enhancing the performance or effectiveness of the management system, but it is not a nonconformity or a requirement.
*Option F is false, because the grading of nonconformities does not have to be explained to the auditee at the opening meeting, but rather at the closing meeting, where the audit findings and conclusions are presented and discussed. The opening meeting is intended to provide an overview of the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and methods, and to confirm the audit arrangements and logistics.
*Option G is false, because the auditee is not always responsible for determining the criteria for grading nonconformities, but rather the audit programme or the audit client, in consultation with the auditee and other relevant parties2. The auditee is responsible for taking corrective action to address the nonconformities, and for providing evidence of their completion and effectiveness.
References: 1: ISO 19011:2018, 3.13; 2: ISO 19011:2018, 6.6.2; 3: ISO 19011:2018, 6.6.3; 4: ISO Audit Findings :Non-conformance - AUVA Certification1; 5: Annex III: Nonconformity grading - FSSC2; : ISO
27001 Certification - Major vs. Minor Nonconformities - Advisera3; : GUIDANCE FOR ADDRESSING AND CLEARING NONCONFORMITIES - SADCAS4; : ISO 19011:2018, 6.2; : ISO 19011:2018, 3.14; :
ISO 19011:2018, 6.7; : ISO 19011:2018, 6.4; : ISO 19011:2018, 6.7.2; : ISO 19011:2018; : ISO 19011:2018; :
ISO 19011:2018; : ISO 19011:2018; : ISO 19011:2018; : [ISO 19011:2018]; : [ISO 19011:2018]; : [ISO
19011:2018]; : [ISO 19011:2018]; : [ISO 19011:2018]; : [ISO 19011:2018]; : [ISO 19011:2018]

NEW QUESTION # 320
......

Pass4SureQuiz is a reliable platform to provide candidates with effective study braindumps that have been praised by all users. For find a better job, so many candidate study hard to prepare the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam, it is not an easy thing for most people to pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam, therefore, our website can provide you with efficient and convenience learning platform, so that you can obtain as many certificates as possible in the shortest time.

Test ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Vce Free: https://www.pass4surequiz.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam-quiz.html

P.S. Free & New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Pass4SureQuiz: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wOQ22En8ku3HUYZBpyGTnrz077e08Cvt